While reading a page about a pretty girl in the elevator, a pretty girl
walked into the elevator, but he didn't notice the pretty girl that
walked into the elevator, because he was busy reading the page about the
pretty girl in the elevator
Hey! My name is Abdulrhman Safar from Saudi Arabia! And I like to examine the status quo!
Thursday, November 27, 2014
Sunday, October 26, 2014
On Art
In his timeless classic
Walden, Henry David Thoreau wrote: 'I have no doubt that some of you who read this book are unable to
pay for all the dinners which you have actually eaten, or for the
coats and shoes which are fast wearing or are already worn out, and
have come to this page to spend borrowed or stolen time, robbing your
creditors of an hour.'
I once heard a great thinker arguing that a painting costs more than a loaf of bread; despite that we can’t
survive on painting, yet we are willing to pay. What possess us to do such thing?
Artists endure, thus they create
Art. Art inspires doing, yet artists don’t. The great Thomas Pine wrote his
influential pamphlet Common Sense only to inspire George Washington to lead a
revolt against the British. Leo Tolstoy’s essay Kingdom of God is Within You
inspired in Gandhi the sense liberation and simplistic life style. It was
Emerson who intellectually lectured on antislavery, but Abraham Lincoln led the
armies after attending his lectures. It was Thoreau who wrote Civil
Disobedience, but Martin Luther King, Jr. championed the Civil Rights
movements.
Did Machiavelli or Milton or Sartre
lead revolutions and revolts? No, they led intellectual revolutions and
revolts; it was the job of those influenced to execute anarchy and wars.
Perhaps we buy the painting because it inspires us.
Are Artists passive? Is Art, as Mr.
Wile once described it, useless? He once said that 'A work of art is useless as a flower is useless. A flower blossoms for
its own joy. We gain a moment of joy by looking at it. That is all that is to
be said about our relations to flowers. Of course man may sell the flower, and
so make it useful to him, but this has nothing to do with the flower. It is not
part of its essence. It is accidental. It is a misuse.’ I ask here: are
those accidentals and misuses are horrible outcomes? Is wrong of me
to pair philosophers and their written heritage with Art? Then
why would Mr. Wilde incept his masterpiece of a novel with a preface on
Art?
I possess little knowledge to answer
that.
Sunday, September 21, 2014
On Success
If I were to use an
analogy to describe success, in my mind rock climbing is an apt one.
Paired with risk, adventure, autonomy and a constant tackling of the unknown, success in Rock Climbing requires momentous endeavors; for one has to possess the heart, the strength and ambition.
Paired with risk, adventure, autonomy and a constant tackling of the unknown, success in Rock Climbing requires momentous endeavors; for one has to possess the heart, the strength and ambition.
But the aspect of Rock
Climbing I wish to expound is of a different nature; it’s broader, and, I hope,
if explained justly, we could understand the intricacies of success.

When a person decides to devote himself to this sport, and for him to climb the thorny mountains, he undergoes extraordinary amounts of technical preparation. This is attained in a place known as the climbing gym, where the novices train tirelessly on artificially constructed walls with grips for hands and feet. It is a daunting discipline; it requires deliberate practice, profound mentorship and plenty of patience.But once that is done; once migrated to the outdoors; once the sun replaces the neon-light; once edgy stones replace the artificial grips; once a mere robe replaces the safe trampoline, the odds escalate to astronomical proportions. The adrenaline level is irrepressible; fear of heights is more menacing; hot breaths evaporate rapidly; the limbs tremble and quiver; palms sweat ceaselessly; teeth grind against each other agonizingly. This time it is not artificial; it is life.
As the Climber and the
companions ascend from the foot of the mountain, they accumulate inches, and
those inches translate to inches of success, if he mistakes, the process corrects
him, but in a costly manner.
The further the Climber and the companions ascend, the smaller those who observe them appear; they matter less now. The more those inches of success accumulate, the more perilous the passages becomes. The Climber is aware that one faulty step will drag him a few inches back; he can’t bare it; it consumes more effort, more time. And while the adversaries grin, the supporters distress. The group he leads counts on him as he explores unfamiliar territories; as he places his palms where varmints could be lurking. His decisions are half made; uncertain.
The further the Climber and the companions ascend, the smaller those who observe them appear; they matter less now. The more those inches of success accumulate, the more perilous the passages becomes. The Climber is aware that one faulty step will drag him a few inches back; he can’t bare it; it consumes more effort, more time. And while the adversaries grin, the supporters distress. The group he leads counts on him as he explores unfamiliar territories; as he places his palms where varmints could be lurking. His decisions are half made; uncertain.

And such is life: a
man is prepped to endeavor his passage with and for those ones he loves,
family, friends and followers. The greater he ascends, the more liabilities he
accumulates. He can’t distract himself by the adversaries; their negativity
might cripple him. And he can’t over celebrate with his supporters; that ecstasy
might elude him in to comfort.
He can’t be afraid
of accumulating inches, for the disadvantages of stagnation are direr.
Wednesday, July 16, 2014
On Intellect
Seldom in my inquiries I have received a consistent definition of Intellect, most
people erroneously pair it with the act of reading books; but I have met
many people who read plentiful, whilst conforming to the doctrinaire of the herd.
That is a fallacy that I wish to abolish. Did reading, universally, symbolize acquiring
knowledge?
In
light of this, I wish to rearticulate Intellect as the manner of perceiving
intricate foreign ideas, liberated from dogmas. Dogmas are the archenemy of
intellect, for intellect stems out of unprejudiced contemplation; a man who
passively reads books that were written to his joy and his complicacy, would be
underprepared or unprepared to the views of rest of the world, and thus he follows
either of two paths: he plunges deeper to his dogmatic ways, where he
replicates the immoderate unfitting conducts of his forefathers. Or he
contemplates the revelations of what he read, thus he shall attain the
universality of thought, and onward he shall meet people of foreign tongues and
lands, but reincarnations of thoughts and experiences, regardless of the minor
variations; each mind, fundamentally, has their agenda and aspirations. And
thus, there exists no absolute intellect, only glimpses of men who strived, and
those we tend to idolize.
I
once met a man who read Moby Dick, and deemed it as the endeavors of Captain Ahab
hunting the White Whale and failed because the Whale is a monstrosity. Whilst
another man, benefiting from a religious context, deemed it as Satan hunting
God, and he failed because God is might. Another, benefiting from a secular
context, deemed it as Man’s attempt to control Nature, and he failed, because
Nature is untamable.
Men
of intellect seldom speak in absoluteness; they’re privy to their fallibility, to what’s beyond their comprehension and to the vastness and assortments of human genius. This I can say this in absoluteness.
Another
archenemy of intellect is pride, the great sin of Lucifer and Hubris. A
verse from the Proverbs 18 says: Before his downfall a man's heart is proud, but humility comes before honor. Malcolm X had a
humbling experience that liberated him. True men of intellect are often the
progenies of certain morbidness; Life humbles men that way.
Aristotle
described the prideful as a person who’s a victim of his own gratifications. Pride
cripples a man from reading the other’s mind. And therefore he possesses no
intellect. Mind you, intellect is not to agree, but to appreciate; they are not
mutually exclusive, but also, in brilliant marriages, they can align.
Lest
of the perils of pride, Marcus Aurelius appointed a servant to follow him when
he entered the gates of Rome whispering to his ear: you are just a man, to fortify himself against the praise of mob.
He was wise.
Another
crippler of intellect is willful obedience to the teachings of fellowmen. It
disallows our faculties from inspecting their façade.
Thomas
Jefferson wistfully championed that it is the right of Man to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; alas, he was
profiteering from his plantation slave farms.
When
Voltaire learnt of Isaac Newton’s fondness of magic, he made great efforts to conceal
this fact in his publications of Newton. Hadn’t been for Economist Kinsey it
might have remained unearthed. Does Voltaire’s behavior suit a man of
intellect? Should this dismiss his formidable contribution to philosophy? I
can’t supply an answer, but I ask of you this: would you rather be a Voltaire?
Or a Kinsey? Yet who is privy to Kinsey’s intellectual mischiefs himself? The
prospects are windingly endless. But we mustn’t forget Rumi’s filed beyond the
fields of right-doing and wrong-doing. There lays grayness between whiteness
and blackness of life.
Thus
I say true intellect is the perusal of greater good, which demands contemplation
liberated from ignorance, arrogance, pride and dogmatism.
I
shall conclude with this: motives of the intellectual must be driven from
within, thus he himself sets the standards of what ought to be and how it ought
to be. If the motives were external ones, then his intellect will be his
damnation, for he shall frantically measure it against alternating variables.
And he is likely to deem himself a deceptionist and thus inherent a sense of
inferiority, and his genius would be a squander.
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
The Virtue of Failure
Success can be
illy devious; it alludes us into extended leisures; upon actualizing our goal
(promotion, graduation, marriage, etc...) we tend to over celebrate;
consequently our drive slows down.
As the cliché
famously says: Success is not a destination,
it is journey.
But definitely
there are destinations in that journey. In our path we often stumble upon them.
We disguise them differently: experiences, learnings, and upward curves... I
think we avoid labeling them for what they truly are: Failure. We grow up
ashamed of it; toss it to the abyss of memory. Alas, squandering all its
fruitful lessons. Failure empowers us, unveils unseen horizons, and keeps us
alert. Individuals who ascend from failures' ashes recognize
the existence of various unfamiliar paths of success; this in
itself cleans the judgmental visor staining our outlook. Failure
gifts us with compassion and understanding, thus reuniting
ourselves with our hardened humanity.
In her inspiring
speech, author JK Rowling declared that ‘…some failure in life is
inevitable. It is impossible to live without failing at something, unless you
live so cautiously that you might as well not have lived at all – in which
case, you fail by default.'
Drawing on this,
it’s critical to recognize that we’re not discussing fake success, which I
define as laboring unsatisfactorily to gain acceptance of others (parents,
managers, peers...), but rather the unreasonable success which manifests our
most inner dream, by conquering the demon that awakens us late at nights, that is if we slept at all.
Conquering that
demon leads us to virgin paths; others might have embarked upon parallel paths,
but never ours. It's designed for us individually, for we’re the creators of
its borders and boundaries.
Poet John Keats
dubbed this notion as Negative Capability. He defines it as: 'the willingness
to embrace uncertainty, live with mystery, and make peace with ambiguity.'
Allow me to assert the notion further and borrow a page from the psychology literature known as Desirable
Difficulty; which states that 'introducing certain difficulties into a process
can greatly improve long-term retention of the process material.' Life imposes
difficulties upon us without permissions; it's wiser if we prepped ourselves to
deal with them. Such practice enables us to extract advantages from
disadvantages; we become invincible. Indeed, Economic states that the greater
the risk, the greater reward.
Now, when I say Embrace failure, I don't mean to have it inferred that rashness and sloppiness should be celebrated. Rather, it’s a
invitation to tackling the unfamiliar, and acknowledging the risky
destinations on unknown paths, face them with irrevocable grit and unspoiled
determination. This undoubtedly bestows happiness upon us; by doing so, our
happiness will contagiously shine and allow those around us to bath in our
light.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)